Tags
If there’s one characteristic that accurately describes most photography enthusiasts it’s the lust for new gear. Camera lust, lens lust, accessory lust…it runs the gamut. Most amateur photographers spend copious time daydreaming about that next great piece of equipment. And to some extent, there’s nothing wrong with that (assuming they don’t mortgage their homes to obtain it). After all, new gear can be a lot of fun.
But there is a problem with much of this gear gaping: many of the gapers are doe-eyed over the latest and greatest piece of equipment because they’re under the impression that obtaining that new camera body or lens is going to make them better photographers. And that, sadly, is rarely if ever the case. New photographic equipment can, in some instances, lead to better photographs but it very seldom will make you a better photographer. At first blush, that may sound contradictory, but it isn’t. Allow me to illustrate.
When I say that new equipment can produce better photos, I’m speaking largely of technical quality and the ability to leverage opportunity. For instance, newer camera sensors are less noisy than older ones; some lenses are sharper than others. An image produced with a higher megapixel camera can, all other things being equal, yield better large prints, than an image from a lower megapixel alternative. A camera-lens combination with a faster frame rate and autofocus acquisition may give the action photographer a better chance of obtaining a usable image from a high speed sequence than a less robust set of gear. And so on.
Equipment does matter. Every time I hear someone say something about Ansel Adams being able to create better images with a pinhole camera than most photographers can obtain with the best current gear, I cringe. These people are missing the point. Ansel Adams would be a lot happier with the images he shot with the best gear than he would with the material generated from a pinhole camera. But the point that these folks are trying to make, in a rather hyperbolic and irrational way, is that the equipment doesn’t make the photographer, and that point I agree with.
Photography, at its most fundamental level, is about seeing. It’s about your ability to translate your vision to a two-dimensional medium. Your gear is your toolset for translating that vision. More capable equipment may make it easier to translate your vision, in the sense that a better set of physical tools may make it easier for a woodworker to build higher quality furniture. But it will not—a few aberrant possibilities aside—improve your vision all by itself. (An exception to the rule might include something like an ultrawide angle lens opening up entirely new ways of looking at the world, thereby broadening one’s art.)
Personally, I haven’t purchased a new piece of photographic equipment since late 2008 (with the exception of a new polarizing filter, which I bought because my old one literally fell apart). And yet, I have no doubt I have become a better photographer over that time. But new equipment had nothing to do with it. Time in the field, time spent musing over how well I seemed to be expressing myself visually and what I could do to improve that expression, time spent studying compositional considerations…to the extent I’ve improved, these are the reasons why.
At the moment, I’m eying the possibility of purchasing the new Nikon D800E camera at some point this year. But I don’t have any illusions about it improving my photography. I believe—with good reason—that it will better enable me to make high quality enlargements. But it won’t make me a better photographer; of that I’m sure. My vision, my ability to see…these things won’t be any better with the D800E than they would be with my current camera (the D700).
If you’re dissatisfied with your photography, ask yourself—honestly—why that is. What’s wrong with your images? If you came up with something other than a technical shortcoming or limitation with your current equipment, you might want to work harder at becoming more proficient with what you already have. (There’s a saying in photography: most cameras are better than most photographers.)
So, don’t let me dampen your enthusiasm for new gear—as long as you’re drooling over that shiny new equipment for a good, actionable, tangible reason. But if you’re pondering that purchase because you think it’s going to make you a better photographer, think twice. In that instance, keep your wallet in your pocket and concentrate on your artistic vision by making the most out of the equipment you already possess.
Thursday Tips is written by Kerry Mark Leibowitz, a guest blogger on 1001 Scribbles, and appears every other Thursday. To read more of his thoughts on photography, please visit his blog: Lightscapes Nature Photography.


Pingback: Thursday Tips: The New Gear Fallacy Redux | 1001 Scribbles
Pingback: TOP (or not…) « 1001 Scribbles
I agree – having new equipment may change your perspective and open your eyes to new ways of photographing. Whilst I think it is great to use what you have, there’s nothing wrong with lusting after gear with the goal to learn even more. ie, comparing and contrasting what you can do with either lens; seeing things in a new way can be so liberating and can educate on the technicality of the camera settings. Besides, researching new equipment is fun! I am in that process now and love how passionate photographers are when talking about their photo-equipment. Wonderful photos on this post.
Yes, getting something truly conceptually new–your first ultra wide angle lens, for instance–can open new artistic horizons. Most of the time, however, new gear means a new camera body to replace the one you already have, or a “better” lens that takes the place of something already in your possession. And that’s where the equipment lust myth (of making you a better photographer) can be so misleading.
Hi Kerry! I have to say that doing all this research on lenses and which ones I may like to purchase has given me alot of food for thought. Research alone has opened up a whole new spectrum of information that I may be ignorant to were I to just stick with shooting with a kit lens. It’s a great exercise for amateurs especially and has made me even more intrigued by photography…
Hi Marina. Rarely, if ever, is research a bad thing.
Nor would I suggest that everyone needs to stick with a kit lens. (I doubt it’s going to shock anyone if I admit that I not only don’t have a kit lens in my bag, but the camera that I currently use, the Nikon D700, doesn’t even have a kit lens.) There are excellent reasons for some–dare I say many–photographers to move up in terms of equipment; in fact, it sounds very much as though you’re one of them. I simply encourage everyone to honestly ask themselves the reasons why they want that new camera and/or lens, to be sure that they’re likely to get what they’re expecting out of what is going to be a costly purchase.
BTW, I saw your most recent blog post, regarding lens choices. The key questions to ask yourself are:
What kind of photography am I doing the most and what (if anything) do I want to do more of?
Am I committed to sticking with the DX (crop sensor) format?
How much am I willing to spend?
There are other questions, but those are the three biggies.
Kerry, thanks for your response! I’m so keen to experiment with my street photography technique and am looking at getting the 35mm f1.8 Nikkor. Do I have any choice but to stick with the DX as I own a D5000 – I am definitely not looking at changing my camera body. The cost of this lens is higher than the 50mm f1.8 though this focal length is a touch more than I am looking for as I like having some background. What do you advise based on the above? I also want to get an 18-200mm lens though I am needing it straight away as I don’t have an immediate travel trip coming up where this would be necessary. Street photography is definitely something I can do on a daily basis. Look forward to your thoughts.
Marina, the reason I asked about whether you were wedded to DX is that,IF you were thinking about moving to FX at some point, DX-specific lenses would become virtually worthless. (One reason why the 35mm 1.4 is so much more expensive than the 1.8 is that it’s an FX lens…plus the extra stop–means far more glass. It’s also a sharper lens, but that’s another matter.)
If you like shooting street photography with a “normal” lens, the 35/1.8 will frame that way on your camera (it’s roughly equivalent to 52mm field of view in full frame terms). If you want a short telephoto, the, the 50/1.8 frames as a 75mm lens in full frame terms. That’s probably the better option for portrait work using DX, but if you want the normal look, you’ll want the 35. That has to be your call, based on the way you like to shoot.
The 18-200 is supposed to be a pretty decent “all purpose” lens (I have no personal experience with it). It’s extremely convenient to have one of these super zooms (it’s giving you the rough equivalent of 28-300 in full frame terms, which covers an awful lot of territory), since it means next to no lens changing…and it’s pretty light, since it’s a variable aperture lens. For travel photography purposes it would seem to be a pretty good choice when you want to go very light and cover roughly 85% of your needed focal lengths.
Agreed to a word. The lust remains, but I guess the main result of better kit is to mak a good shot easier, not possible.
Exactly so.
Many a true word here. How often I have seen someone walking around with an expensive camera and they are using it in ‘Automatic’ mode. They think the camera will do all the work for them………
About ten years ago, I was on location in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan and a large photo workshop descended on my shooting spot about 20 minutes after I got there. Many of the 20-odd workshop participants were using the latest and greatest in terms of photo gear–tens of thousands of dollars worth of equipment, but few if any of them had any idea how to use their cameras. They all wanted to become better photographers and naturally assumed that having the best (and, by extension, most expensive) gear would provide the shortest route to achieving their goal. It’s a commonly held belief, so I’m not making fun of these folks…it just turns out to be…well…wrong.
I know the feeling! Mind I bit the bullet and bought myself a better lens for my EOS 450. Would you believe I made do wit the standard kit lens! With a new lens its given me so many more options – not only can I shoot much wider shots but night photography shots are more successful as well. I still get the what ifs….if I can had a F/1.2 etc etc and then I see the prices!
Yes, new equipment certainly can help produce images that otherwise would be difficult or impossible. (Try shooting auroras, for instance, without being able to open up to f/2.8 or wider.) But this is still essentially having the right tools for the job, not about improving your vision.
amazing water fall
Thank you.
fantastic!
Thanks!
I love the article and could not agree more! I will be following you on here and can’t wait to see what you come up with next!!
It is so true. An excellent cook can make a fabulous meal even on a campfire. A poor cook couldn’t make a good meal in the best of kitchens.
Another good analogy, thanks!
Amen, Brother! Great post and photos!
Much obliged, Michael.
Amazing photos – thanks for sharing…
Beautiful Photos – thanks for sharing!
Thank you!
Kudos Kerry, folks ask me all the time…’What kind of camera do you have/use?” I tell them and then I try to explain to them what you wrote here. Most times they stare back in disbelief…until they think about it for a bit.
This is a well written piece that should be read by all aspiring or seasoned photographers!
Thanks, David. It’s interesting–the special regard people seem to have for photographic equipment and the belief that it is largely, if not entirely, responsible for “good” work. I wonder, for instance, how many people ask musicians the make and model of their instruments?
This is beautiful… Love that watrefall. By the way I updated my latest post and it’s acting out on me, so here is the link http://eof737.wordpress.com/2012/04/18/memories-of-moments-in-bliss/
Thanks.
Right on! My lust is for gear to make larger, more detailed, sharper prints but like you I’ve realized the gear won’t make them GREAT prints. Photography takes place between the ears – everything else is just technology. Good comments – hope people take them to heart when thinking, “what do I need to make better photos?”
Beautiful picture – am reading your posts after so long – have been travelling, now am back and have to catch uo through so many posts… keep on scribbling!
So true! On our photography trips I see great work from simple equipment –the eye and the instructor seem as important if not more important.
Good post – reminds me of golf amd my must have new gear obsession!
Good analogy!
A very well written article and something that keeps running at the back of my mind everytime one of my friends pick up some new gear! Personally I can’t afford anything more than my canon 600D and a tamron 17 – 50 and a canon 50 prime! for the moment thats got to do I guess. Though, I would like to say there is definitely a thin line between equipment making things technically better or actually limiting you. The reason why most of the photographers can claim to have a good “eye” is because their “inexpensive” 2000 dollar lens lets them see those things! or capture things which a normal camera wouldn’t. But of course I totall agree that the ability lies in the eye to catch the moment
Thanks. One of the dirty little secrets about high end gear (e.g. high resolving digital camera bodies and lenses) is that they expose every technical flaw in a photographer’s technique. In that respect, ironically, some people actually find themselves producing lower quality imagery (from a technical standpoint) after upgrading.
Agreed totally! I’ve heard people saying that if they don’t a DSLR they can’t get great images and when i show them my old work from my Sony Cybershot, they stare at me!
And then there are those people, who already have great bodies like the 600D or D5100, 60D or D7000 and have not even used it a year and now they want to change and get “something better” …..
Great job with the article, kudos!
Thanks. Yes, there are definitely some folks out there who spend more time lusting after the next piece of equipment rather than mastering what they already own.
I love your images….I love nature and landscapes too…I am yet learning how to use the camera I bought a year ago…I am beginner here with photography…what I have found is that you “Just Do It”….and for me that is easy to do as I LOVE IT….I can spend hours shooting photos….the rest of the time is looking for that creative inspiring moment for that shot…and when I look for it on some days and it evades me I shoot anyway:) Thank you for sharing and I will drop by your blog:)
For the first year of owning my DSLR I shot in auto mode to get the feel for the camera. I am finally starting to shoot more in different modes and am LOVING it. I had no idea I was missing out. I was confused at first about the F stop (when to shoot with the shutter wider or more narrow). I picked up a book called Understanding Exposure at my local camera shop and am now finally starting to understand it! Here is a link for Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/Understanding-Exposure-3rd-Edition-Photographs/dp/0817439390/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1334883566&sr=8-1
I mainly shoot landscapes and critters so the extra reference guide really helped me out. Also, a lot of it is trial and error for me. I take a picture in three different modes, make a note on my cell phone of what settings I used, print them out, and then compare the results.
Good luck to you!!!
Amanda Foxx
Thank you so much for you inside tips….I am ordering the book as I write:) Love the Corvette shots…wow! We had a white 1968 Corvette for a while after we were married….fun car:) I love shooting images and look for the creative part…it certainly fuels your soul with a passion that says shoot shoot and shoot some more:) Love it! I have shot a lot in auto mode too but the last several months I have chosen different settings and I love that.
It mixes it up:)
It is a really nifty book to have around. You will not regret your purchase one bit! I love how they give you the “before” and “after” examples. You can really see a difference in the photo’s. They also write in an everyday lingo that you can understand which is awesome!
My parents really enjoy their Corvette’s and I can honestly say I enjoy them as well
I was hopping from one car to the next all day on Easter Sunday..which was REALLY fun! Here is an article that was written/published for my Dad’s car: http://www.corvettefever.com/featuredvehicles/corp_0912_1968_chevrolet_corvette/index.html
I love to mix up my photography that’s for sure. With me, you never know quite what you will get. Generally it depends on my mood for the day
Feel free to pop me a message if you are on the hunt for additional reference material.
Thank you much and I will keep in touch:)
We love Corvette’s too…when we met each other my hubby was driving a 1966 Yellow Corvette Coupe…and I was driving my 1964 Silver Corvette Coupe…match made in heaven:) I am still on the hunt for another Coupe…from 1964-1967…of course a Silver 1964 would be my ideal! If only if only….and I would love another 68 too:)
Thanks for the comment. Beginner or not, it sounds to me as though you’re on the right track. Keep at it!
Will do:)
Hello! Is that Cannon Beach in the third photograph?
Yes, that’s Cannon Beach (Haystack Rock, to be specific).
My sister lives not far away. I always loved that place!
This is so true. I both lust for new gear because I know that it would help the technical aspects and allow me to branch out and try some of the ideas I have and I know that I have a whole ton to learn about how to become a better photographer. I love the light on the trees in that second photo!
Thanks. The shot you mentioned was taken just a few minutes before sunset, hence the sweet light.
I love that time of day for photography!
Beautiful. thanks for sharing Nonoy Manga